kyle/boxmaker
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Record why task 01 had an earlier attempt

Browse Source 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
kyle
2026-09-17 11:02:00 -07:00
co-authored by Claude Fable 5.1
parent 2426b45852
commit 35a7a4e7ea
1 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/implementer-log.md
+5
View File
@@ -54,6 +54,11 @@ Open question for the owner: the task 01 row says the skeleton files were "alrea
untracked from a prior attempt". The log has no row for that attempt, so its gate runs and the untracked from a prior attempt". The log has no row for that attempt, so its gate runs and the
reason it ended are not recorded. reason it ended are not recorded.
Answered by the owner, 2026-09-17: OpenCode was interrupted twice during task 01 because another
process restarted `llama-server`. The owner started a new OpenCode session, which picked up the
files the interrupted ones had left. The implementer did not abandon anything; the inference
server went away under it.
On the experiment (review once per milestone): it held up for M1. None of the defects was built on On the experiment (review once per milestone): it held up for M1. None of the defects was built on
by a later task, and all were found by reading the branch and probing it from outside. M1 is the by a later task, and all were found by reading the branch and probing it from outside. M1 is the
easy case, though: types pinned by byte-exact fixtures. M2 has behaviour that fixtures cannot pin easy case, though: types pinned by byte-exact fixtures. M2 has behaviour that fixtures cannot pin