gatewayd: approvals, the registry and the judging of commands

Implemented-By: OpenCode session (model recorded in docs/implementer-log.md)

docs/implementer-log.md

@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ reviewer adds findings under "Reviews" once per milestone.
 
 | Task | Date | Status | Gate runs | First gate | Deviations | Notes | Model |
 |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| M4b/11-gatewayd-approvals-registry | 2026-09-24 | done | 1 | pass | none | Copied `docs/plans/M4b/files/crates/gatewayd/src/approvals/mod.rs` (the structs `Posted`/`Judged`/`Registry`, the `pub mod text;` still there, and the five `todo!()`s) to `crates/gatewayd/src/approvals/`, and `docs/plans/M4b/files/crates/gatewayd/tests/approvals_judge.rs` to `crates/gatewayd/tests/`. Filled `add` (insert by `approval`), `remove` (remove by id), `holds` (contains_key), `waiting_sessions` (the `session` of every entry), and `judge` (the six spec-section-7 checks in order: `user` in `approvers` else `NOT_APPROVER`, the command to `(id, approved, reason)` — `Approve` true/None, `Deny` false/`reason.clone()`, `Malformed` `USAGE`, then `get(&id)` present else "not pending here", `answerable` else "bxctl approvals", `root` matches else "its own thread", `at <= shown_at` else "answered before shown in full", then `remove` and `send` the `ApprovalReply`, a gone connection → "not pending here"). Brought `Approve`/`Deny`/`Malformed` into scope with the `ApprovalCommand` type, and cloned the `answer` `Sender` out of the entry before the early-return refusals so the held lock's `remove` does not conflict. All six `approvals_judge` and six `approvals_text` tests pass; `make gate` prints `gate: ok` on the first run. | ? |
 | M4b/10-gatewayd-approval-text | 2026-09-24 | done | 1 | pass | none | Copied `docs/plans/M4b/files/crates/gatewayd/src/approvals/mod.rs-task10` to `crates/gatewayd/src/approvals/mod.rs` (the module comment and `pub mod text;`), the `text.rs` skeleton, and `docs/plans/M4b/files/crates/gatewayd/tests/approvals_text.rs` to `crates/gatewayd/tests/`, then added `pub mod approvals;` to `lib.rs` first, before `pub mod config;`. Filled the eight functions the skeleton left as `todo!()`: `code` (a backtick run one longer than `longest_run`, with a padding space on both sides when the text starts or ends with a backtick so CommonMark keeps it literal), `fence` (same, at least three backticks, wrapped `fence\n`), `longest_run` (a char scan keeping the longest run of consecutive backticks), `minute` (the rfc3339 date and `HH:MM` plus ` UTC`), `name` (the serde string form when there is one, else `{value:?}`), `reply_line` (the `!approve`/`!deny` line), `ended_line` (the six-arm match on `Ended`, the `Denied` reason and any `Refused` reason run through `name`/`code`), and `with_ending` (the last post, a blank line, then `ended_line`). `render` was already written in the skeleton. All six `approvals_text` tests pass; `make gate` prints `gate: ok` on the first run. | ? |
 | M4b/09-gatewayd-mm-edit | 2026-09-24 | done | 1 | pass | none | Copied `docs/plans/M4b/files/crates/gatewayd/tests/mm_edit.rs` into `crates/gatewayd/tests/`. In `rest.rs`: added the `User { username: String }` struct and `valid_username` (1..=64 bytes of a-z, 0-9, `.`, `-` and `_`) after `Channel`, then `patch_post` (a `post` that is not `valid_id` is `Json` and nothing is sent; otherwise PUT `/api/v4/posts/{post}/patch` with `{"message": message}` through `call`, the answer a `Post` `check`ed and dropped) and `username` (a `user` that is not `valid_id` is `Json`; GET `/api/v4/users/{user}`, a username that is not `valid_username` is `Json`, else the name) at the end of `impl Client`. `cargo fmt --all` then `cargo test -p gatewayd --test mm_edit --test mm_rest` green (4 and 10 passed); `make gate` prints `gate: ok` on the first run. | ? |
 | M4b/08-gatewayd-mention-commands | 2026-09-24 | done | 1 | pass | none | Copied `sessions_mention.rs` into `crates/gatewayd/tests/`, the new `sessions.rs` (commands now route to `Approval`, the mention stripped) and `serve.rs` (from `serve.rs-task08`, the turn's text is `start`). In `sessions.rs`: added `Route::Approval { thread, command, user, post, at }` after `Queue(Message)`; added the given `ApprovalCommand` enum, `MAX_REASON = proto::MAX_REASON`, and `approval_command` (returns `None` for text that is not a `!` command, else `Approve`/`Deny`/`Malformed`); wrote `strip_mention` (the five steps: strip a leading `@`, take the longest name run, trim a trailing dot, match `me` case-insensitively, return the message when the remainder is empty); in `route` bound `message` from `strip_mention(&post.message, &self.me_name)`, replaced the `!` command block with `approval_command` → Approval then any other `!` → Reply UNKNOWN_COMMAND, and changed the final Queue's `text: message.clone()` to `message.to_string()` since `message` is now `&str`; updated the step comment. In `handle.rs` `handle_post` added the `Route::Approval` arm posting M4B_COMMAND (approvals module wired in task 15) and `M4B_COMMAND` to the `use`. All three suites pass (serve 6, sessions 8, sessions_mention 4); `make gate` prints `gate: ok` on the first run. | ? |