2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
kyleandClaude Opus 5.5 f389a9a43a M5a plan: tasks 21 and 22, from the device check
21: the ledger raises a session's state by the stricter of the grant's
label and the result's own, so a clean session that recalls a
memory-tainted note becomes untrusted and cannot write it into
memory.md (found on straylight, 2026-09-25). 22: the answers to a note
name notes.md, and for an untrusted add the file that was not changed.
The new given tests are ledger_label.rs and new versions of memoryd's
edit.rs and serve.rs; the old copies are kept as -task06 and -task10. On
a scratch tree at the end of task 20: the named tests fail and then pass,
5 and 4 mutations are caught, and the gate passes with 944 tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-25 17:55:41 -07:00
kyleandClaude Opus 5.5 de1032157b Plan M5a: local memory in 15 tasks
memoryd (files, the check, edits, journal, index, recall, serving),
the memory tools and built-in grants in brokerd, the memory block in
loopd, bxctl reindex and memory, and the device checks with memoryd.

Each task was built as a reference and gated. Each was replayed on its
own at its end state (854 to 936 tests) and mutation-checked. Each
skeleton compiles and fails its tests. Every todo comment was read
beside its signature.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-24 15:32:54 -07:00