The research feeds M5b's sanitizer. One finding is a bug in the M5a
draft: category Cf misses variation selectors, the combining grapheme
joiner, and the Hangul and Braille fillers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Writes from sessions that have read untrusted content go to the
archive, labelled untrusted, and never reach the prompt. Every write is
checked, announced in its thread, journalled and can be undone.
Session-scoped approvals for other tools become an open decision.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The owner's review of 2026-09-24. P17: the memory tool gains
consolidate, which moves entries out of memory.md into
memory/archive.md, and from M5b into Honcho, instead of losing them.
P18: memoryd owns memory/ and the SQLite index, so every memory tool
runs in one place.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The owner's direction of 2026-09-24:
- Memory is three local files, as Hermes has them: a soul written by
the owner, and memory and user files the agent edits.
- Honcho is the fleet's memory. Each Boxmaker writes only to its own
workspace, and can read other workspaces at a trust level the owner
sets.
- A new role, memoryd, does the syncing, because brokerd never holds
conversation history and loopd has no network.
- M5 splits into M5a (files and local search), M5b (memoryd and
Honcho) and M5c (the scheduler).
The brief is not changed until the owner approves P17 to P20.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The review of tasks 01 to 15 goes in the implementer log, with the
device check against the owner's Mattermost. Three follow-ups:
- 16: the refusal without a runner says why.
- 17: the texts that say who asked.
- 18: approvals from non-approvers in direct or group messages go to
an approver.
Task 14's given serve_approvals.rs becomes serve_approvals.rs-task14,
since task 18 hands over a new version. Tip T31 is added.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Task 15's session found the defect in serve/approvals.rs, a file it did not list, and stopped.
The comment in task 14 used one name for two values; task 14's tests could not reach it. Lesson T30.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Skeletons for new files only; existing files change by exact edits, so no task overwrites an
earlier one's work. Each task's tests were run against a reference built in order from master,
with the gate at each step and mutations checked; each skeleton compiles and fails its tests, and
every todo!() comment was read beside its signature. The reference is kept off this machine.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
approval_reply and GatewayOutcome (proto already has an ApprovalAnswer); the bot's edit permission
confirmed on the owner's server; a restart replaces a dead post's text; the reason escaped as
inline code; the part size bound; the reply for an approval too long to show.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The owner's decisions of 2026-09-24: commands only, no reactions; an approvers list that falls
back to allow.users; approvals in the asking thread; on a gatewayd restart, old posts are marked
dead and brokerd's courier posts pending approvals again.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The test swaps the file between the check and the open through a `between` hook. A reference fix
passed it and the gate (769 tests) in the working tree, caught two mutations, and was removed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
kyleandClaude Opus 5.5