boxmaker/crates/gatewayd/tests/approvals_judge.rs

//! Which commands answer an approval, in the order of the M4b spec, section 7; everything else is
//! answered with its reason and changes nothing. Do not edit.

use std::sync::mpsc::{self, Receiver};

use bxcore::ApprovalReply;
use gatewayd::approvals::{Judged, NOT_APPROVER, Posted, Registry, USAGE};
use gatewayd::sessions::ApprovalCommand::{self, Approve, Deny, Malformed};

const KYLE: &str = "k0000000000000000000000000";
const HERMES: &str = "h0000000000000000000000000";
const DM: &str = "d0000000000000000000000000";
const ROOT: &str = "r0000000000000000000000000";
const ELSEWHERE: &str = "e0000000000000000000000000";
const CMD: &str = "c0000000000000000000000001";

fn approvers() -> Vec<String> {
    vec![KYLE.to_string()]
}

/// A registry with approval 42 posted in ROOT, shown at 100.
fn posted(answerable: bool) -> (Registry, Receiver<ApprovalReply>) {
    let registry = Registry::new();
    let (tx, rx) = mpsc::channel();
    registry.add(Posted {
        approval: 42,
        session: format!("mm-{ROOT}"),
        channel: DM.to_string(),
        root: ROOT.to_string(),
        shown_at: 100,
        answerable,
        answer: tx,
    });
    (registry, rx)
}

fn judge(r: &Registry, command: &ApprovalCommand, user: &str, root: &str, at: i64) -> Judged {
    r.judge(command, user, root, CMD, at, &approvers())
}

#[test]
fn an_approver_in_the_thread_after_the_post_answers_it() {
    let (r, rx) = posted(true);
    assert_eq!(judge(&r, &Approve(42), KYLE, ROOT, 101), Judged::Sent);
    assert_eq!(
        rx.try_recv().unwrap(),
        ApprovalReply {
            approval: 42,
            approved: true,
            by: KYLE.to_string(),
            post: CMD.to_string(),
            reason: None
        }
    );
    assert!(!r.holds(42), "answered once");
    assert_eq!(
        judge(&r, &Approve(42), KYLE, ROOT, 102),
        Judged::Reply("approval 42 is not pending here".to_string())
    );
    assert!(rx.try_recv().is_err(), "a second answer goes nowhere");
}

#[test]
fn a_refusal_carries_its_reason() {
    let (r, rx) = posted(true);
    assert_eq!(
        judge(
            &r,
            &Deny(42, Some("not on a Friday".to_string())),
            KYLE,
            ROOT,
            101
        ),
        Judged::Sent
    );
    let got = rx.try_recv().unwrap();
    assert_eq!(
        (got.approved, got.reason.as_deref()),
        (false, Some("not on a Friday"))
    );
    let (r, rx) = posted(true);
    assert_eq!(judge(&r, &Deny(42, None), KYLE, ROOT, 101), Judged::Sent);
    assert_eq!(rx.try_recv().unwrap().reason, None);
}

#[test]
fn everything_else_is_refused_with_its_reason_in_order() {
    let cases: &[(&ApprovalCommand, &str, &str, i64, &str)] = &[
        (&Approve(42), HERMES, ROOT, 101, NOT_APPROVER),
        (&Malformed, HERMES, ROOT, 101, NOT_APPROVER),
        (&Malformed, KYLE, ROOT, 101, USAGE),
        (
            &Approve(7),
            KYLE,
            ROOT,
            101,
            "approval 7 is not pending here",
        ),
        (
            &Approve(42),
            KYLE,
            ELSEWHERE,
            101,
            "approval 42 is answered in its own thread",
        ),
        (
            &Approve(42),
            KYLE,
            ROOT,
            100,
            "approval 42 was answered before it was shown in full",
        ),
        (
            &Approve(42),
            KYLE,
            ROOT,
            50,
            "approval 42 was answered before it was shown in full",
        ),
        (
            &Approve(42),
            KYLE,
            ELSEWHERE,
            50,
            "approval 42 is answered in its own thread",
        ),
    ];
    for (command, user, root, at, want) in cases {
        let (r, rx) = posted(true);
        assert_eq!(
            judge(&r, command, user, root, *at),
            Judged::Reply(want.to_string()),
            "{command:?} {user} {root} {at}"
        );
        assert!(r.holds(42), "still pending after {command:?}");
        assert!(rx.try_recv().is_err(), "nothing sent for {command:?}");
    }
}

#[test]
fn too_long_to_show_is_answered_only_in_bxctl() {
    let (r, rx) = posted(false);
    assert_eq!(
        judge(&r, &Approve(42), KYLE, ROOT, 101),
        Judged::Reply("approval 42 can only be answered with bxctl approvals".to_string())
    );
    assert!(r.holds(42) && rx.try_recv().is_err());
}

#[test]
fn an_answer_whose_connection_is_gone_is_not_pending() {
    let (r, rx) = posted(true);
    drop(rx);
    assert_eq!(
        judge(&r, &Approve(42), KYLE, ROOT, 101),
        Judged::Reply("approval 42 is not pending here".to_string())
    );
}

#[test]
fn the_waiting_sessions_and_removal() {
    let (r, _rx) = posted(true);
    assert_eq!(r.waiting_sessions(), [format!("mm-{ROOT}")]);
    assert_eq!(r.remove(42).map(|p| p.approval), Some(42));
    assert!(r.waiting_sessions().is_empty() && !r.holds(42) && r.remove(42).is_none());
}