P6 task 03: an explicit Design section (state, worker loop, Cancel, Close) after the first attempt spent its whole reply deliberating the concurrency

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-26 21:49:35 -07:00
parent 103ec3d05a
commit 38f0689ae3
2 changed files with 87 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -78,4 +78,10 @@ intended reasons before each task is implemented.
    - `guard.PreCheck` moved to an owner commit on master. The old task 05 (now 06) told the
      implementer to edit `internal/guard/`, which `AGENTS.md` forbids: my contradiction, found
      while fixing the above.
+- **Task 03 (workers), first attempt, 21:31–21:48.** Same mode again: the model deliberated over
+  the concurrency design in one reply, which ended mid-sentence. That was probably the 32k
+  output cap, and a reply without a tool call ends `opencode run`. No file was written.
+  `AGENTS.md` rule 6 alone did not prevent it. The owner changes: task 03 gains a **Design**
+  section that decides the concurrency (state, the worker loop, Cancel, Close), so the task is
+  transcription, not design. Task 02 (core) passed first time (`e2ddb2e`).